![]() While the authors do an admirable job of capturing their subject’s leadership style, they are stronger when assessing military strategy and recounting the details of key battles. Bush praised Churchill and tried to invoke his spirit when discussing the response to the terrorist attacks, and he kept a bust of Churchill in the Oval Office. The events of September 1939 had proved him England’s most sober statesman as well as its most prophetic.”īecause of these traits, Churchill has long been admired on both the left and right sides of the political divide, albeit more often on the latter.ĭuring the aftermath of Sept. Reid) that “despite the fact that Churchill was prone to sentimentality, was mercurial, and at times lacked strategic military sense, he had through intuitive leaps and careful analysis during the 1930s, arrived at an astonishingly accurate forecast of the calamity that had since befallen Europe and England. The authors note (in a section no doubt written by Mr. ![]() However, the portrait that emerges in “The Last Lion: Defender of the Realm, 1940-1965” is also somewhat nuanced. He suggests that the former prime minister “attained what the American humanist psychologist Abraham Maslow called ‘self actualization,’ the condition at the top of Maslow’s ‘hierarchy of needs,’ where he found creativity, morality, spontaneity, and the ability to parse problems, accept facts, and refute prejudices.”Ĭhurchill is justly praised for his early warnings about the dangers of Adolf Hitler and for his moral leadership during World War II. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |